5 Comments

Mark, did you notice that this review paper that you’ve cited (which is not a detailed study and hence has no Methods section) has no reference for their opening line about “the virus”?

“The virus that caused COVID-19 was first named “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2” (SARS-CoV-2) in February 2020 in recognition of the disease’s pulmonary symptoms and the lung’s role as its initial target organ, as with its SARS predecessor.”

The authors didn’t attempt to give a reference to a study showing the existence of the alleged “virus” – probably because there are none… and if they were to cite the pseudoscientific “isolation” studies we could easily pull them apart.

It’s distressing that are you still promoting this scary weaponized “virus” narrative that has zero valid scientific evidence behind it.

Expand full comment

That was an awesome presentation clearly explaining a complex topic. Thank you.

Expand full comment

This is really fascinating and eye opening. Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

Expand full comment